So, there has been a progression in my thinking, as it pertains to the self assembling lyotropic medium, the refractive boundaries it creates, the irreptile nature of its crystallography, the speed of the tessellating (slow = C) light energy through the medium, and the speed of the energy on a built-path (first response and all subsequent, until decay).
Energy drives assembly in the intra-molecular world of mass. For certain quantum materials, it is energy driven linear self assembly. The energy flows via this self assembly, and the mass follows form. It's all a together sort of thing.
This "first half cycle" tessellation build-out, and the attendant speed difference (forward stroke at speed C, subsequent transits at nearly instantaneous speed), should be an experiment to be done to verify this theory.
What I don't understand is how Einstein and Co. could have missed this, and still write their papers with all of the mathematics within them. It seems they had the cart before the horse, but still managed some of the correct mathematics within the theories, and so the cart really was pushing the horse. It makes no sense to me.
Energy drives assembly in the intra-molecular world of mass. For certain quantum materials, it is energy driven linear self assembly. The energy flows via this self assembly, and the mass follows form. It's all a together sort of thing.
This "first half cycle" tessellation build-out, and the attendant speed difference (forward stroke at speed C, subsequent transits at nearly instantaneous speed), should be an experiment to be done to verify this theory.
What I don't understand is how Einstein and Co. could have missed this, and still write their papers with all of the mathematics within them. It seems they had the cart before the horse, but still managed some of the correct mathematics within the theories, and so the cart really was pushing the horse. It makes no sense to me.